Contreras v. Zeke et al
Filing
38
Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations re: 36 Report and Recommendation on re: 1 Complaint filed by Matthew Contreras. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Zeke and Taylor are dismissed without prejudice Pursu ant to Rule 4(m). Defendant Wauson's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 31) is GRANTED Plaintiff's official-capacity claims, if any, against Defendant Wauson are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. There is no just reason for de lay in entering a final judgment and final judgment shall be entered as to the above-named Defendants and claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. As to the remaining individual-capacity claim against Defendant Wauson, the Court will separately enter a limited scheduling order for the purpose of making a preliminary determination on qualified immunity. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 8/1/2022) (bdg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
LUBBOCK DIVISION
MATTHEW CONTRERAS,
$
Institutional ID No. 23 19954
$
$
Plaintifl
$
$
$
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:21-CV-00038-C
$
SGT. ZEKE, et al.,
$
$
Defendants
$
ORDER
The United States Magistrate Judge entered his Report and Recommendation on March 9,
2022, recommending that the Court (1) dismiss Defendants Zeke and Taylor pursuant to Federal
Rule of
civil
Procedure a(m); (2) grant Defendant wauson's motion to dismiss (Doc.
3l)
and
dismiss any official-capacity claim against Wauson; and (3) enter a limited scheduling order,
requiring Defendant wauson to file a motion for summary judgment for the purpose of making a
preliminary determination on qualified immunity' (Doc. 36). No objections were filed'
The Court reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge for plain
error. Finding none, the Court ADOPTS the findings, conclusions, and recommendation ofthe
United States Magistrate Judge.
It is therefore ORDERED:
1.
Plaintiff s claims against Defendants zeke
and Taylor are dismissed
without
prejudice Pursuant to Rule 4(m).
2.
Defendant Wauson's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 31) is GRANTED Plaintiff s
official-capacity claims, if any, against Defendant Wauson are dismissed with
prejudice for failure to state a claim.
J.
There is no just reason for delay in entering a final judgment and final judgment
shall be entered as to the above-named Defendants and claims pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Final Judgment will be entered accordingly.
As to the remaining individual-capacity claim against Defendant Wauson, the Cou(
separately enter a limited scheduling order for the purpose of making a preliminary
determination on qualifi ed immunity.
DatedAugust
/
,2022.
44'7'-2''
I
R.
Senior U
MINGS
udge
d States
I
2
will
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?