Hostetter et al v. Gillock
Filing
52
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation in this case (ECF No. 50 ) should be and is hereby ACCEPTED and Defendant Gillock& #039;s objections OVERRULED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant Gillock's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 30 ) is DENIED, Defendant the City of Nocona's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 33 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and Plaintiff's claims against the City of Nocona are DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 6/1/2017) (baa)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
JENNIFER HOSTETTER, Individually
and as Administratrix of the Estate of
Larry Hostetter,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROBERT GILLOCK, Individually,
and CITY OF NOCONA, TEXAS,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 7:17-cv-00006-O
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in
this case. See Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation, May 2, 2017, ECF No. 50. Defendant
Robert Gillock filed objections. See Def.’s Obj. FCR, ECF No. 51. The Magistrate Judge
recommends that the Court deny Defendant Gillock’s Motion to Dismiss and deny in part and
grant in part Defendant City of Nocona’s Motion to Dismiss. The Court has concluded a de novo
review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which an objection was
made. The Court finds that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation in this case (ECF
No. 50) should be and is hereby ACCEPTED and Defendant Gillock’s objections
OVERRULED.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant Gillock’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 30)
is DENIED, Defendant the City of Nocona’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 33) is GRANTED in
part and DENIED in part, and Plaintiff’s claims against the City of Nocona are DISMISSED
with prejudice.
SO ORDERED on this 1st day of June, 2017.
_____________________________________
Reed O’Connor
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?