Glenn v. Vendor Resource Management et al

Filing 15

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant Vendor Resource Management's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6 ) is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Vendor Resource Management are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 4/26/2017) (skg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION SHERRIE GLENN, Plaintiff, v. VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 7:17-cv-00016-O-BP ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case (ECF No. 14). No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation is now ripe for review. The Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant Vendor Resource Management’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6) is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims against Vendor Resource Management are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. SO ORDERED on this 26th day of April, 2017. _____________________________________ Reed O’Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?