Parham et al v. City of Burkburnett et al

Filing 108

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONOF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 101 : Accordingly, Defendant McDonald's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 83 ] is DENIED and Defendant Leonard's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 83 ] is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Leonard are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 6/22/2018) (skg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
§
SHELLY D. PARHAM, Individually, and §
VICTOR HINES, III, as Independent
§
Administrator of, and on behalf of, the
§
Estate of Marcus Johnson,
§
§
Plaintiffs,
§
§
v.
§
§
CITY OF BURKBURNETT, TEXAS, et al.,§
§
Defendants.
§
§

Civil Action No. 7:17-cv-00036-M-BP

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge and conducting a de novo review of those parts of the Findings and
Conclusions to which objections have been made, I am of the opinion that the Findings and
Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and
Conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly, Defendant McDonald’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 83] is DENIED and
Defendant Leonard’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 83] is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs’ claims
against Defendant Leonard are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
SO ORDERED.
June 22, 2018.

_________________________________
BARBARA M. G. LYNN
CHIEF JUDGE