Joe v. Non Stop Connections, et al

Filing 9

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United StatesMagistrate Judge 8 for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Con clusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice. By separate judgment, all of the Plaintiff's claims will be DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 8/21/2017) (skg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION DEMARCUS KENARD JOE, TDCJ No. 01047716, Plaintiff, v. NON STOP CONNECTIONS (PEN PAL SERVICE COMPANY) and TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 7:17-CV-00077-M-BP ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. By separate judgment, all of the Plaintiff’s claims will be DISMISSED without prejudice. SIGNED this 21st day of August, 2017.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?