Johnson v. Sheriff of Wichita County

Filing 11

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclu sions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 6 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Chief Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn on 8/31/2017) (skg)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
STEPHEN EUGENE JOHNSON,
AH 8857, SO No. 86962,
Petitioner,
v.
DAVID DUKE,
Sheriff of Wichita County,
Respondent.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Civil Action No. 7:17-CV-00085-M-BP

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge for plain error, I am of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly, Petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 6) is
DISMISSED without prejudice.
SIGNED this 31st day of August, 2017.