Pool v Franklin County, Washington State et al

Filing 26

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED for failure to exhaust state remedies and as moot. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/2/2019) (trt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION JEFFERY LAMONT POOL, Petitioner, v. DAVID DUKE, Sheriff, Wichita County Sheriff’s Office, Respondent. § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 7:18-cv-027-O-BP ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This is a habeas action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in which Petitioner challenges the validity of his extradition from Connell, Washington to Wichita Falls, Texas. The United States Magistrate Judge entered his Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation in which he recommends that the petition be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies and as moot. See ECF No. 24. Petitioner has not filed objections. The District Court has reviewed the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding no error, I am of the opinion that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasons for dismissal set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation are correct and they are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the Findings of the Court. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED for failure to exhaust state remedies and as moot. SO ORDERED this 2nd day of January, 2019. _____________________________________ Reed O’Connor UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?