Wren v. Midwestern State University et al
Filing
26
ORDER ACCEPTING 23 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONOF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16 ) should be and is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff's original claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff may proceed based on the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 25 ), filed February 7, 2019. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/8/2019) (skg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
REGINA WREN,
Plaintiff,
v.
MIDWESTERN STATE
UNIVERISTY, et al.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 7:18-cv-00060-O-BP
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in
this case. See ECF No. 23. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation
is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and
recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that
the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the
Findings and Conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16) should
be and is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff’s original claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.
Plaintiff may proceed based on the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 25), filed February 7, 2019.
SO ORDERED on this 8th day of February, 2019.
_____________________________________
Reed O’Connor
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?