Baumgartner v. Thomas et al
Filing
18
ORDER ACCEPTING 17 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: It is ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims under federal law are dismissed with prejudice and his claims asserting violations of Texas law are dismissed without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 5/22/2023) (mmw)
Case 7:22-cv-00081-O-BP Document 18 Filed 05/22/23
Page 1 of 1 PageID 165
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
DAVID BAUMGARTNER,
Plaintiff,
v.
MARSHALL THOMAS, et al.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 7:22-cv-00081-O-BP
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation
in this case. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is ripe for
review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation
for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and
Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and
Conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 8) is
GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims under federal law are dismissed with prejudice and his claims
asserting violations of Texas law are dismissed without prejudice.
SO ORDERED on this 22nd day of May, 2023.
_____________________________________
Reed O’Connor
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?