Castaneda-Monroy v. United States of America

Filing 37

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 36 Report and Recommendations. The Court hereby DENIES 1 Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. A certificate of appealability shall not issue. (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1)

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas

ENTERED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BROWNSVILLE DIVISION
ANTONIO CASTANEDA-MONROY
Petitioner,
VS.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

May 02, 2018
David J. Bradley, Clerk

CIVIL NO. 1:15-CV-00052

ORDER
Before the Court is the April 2, 2018, Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of
the Magistrate Judge to whom this case was referred. Dkt. No. 36. Petitioner has
not filed objections to the R&R, and the time to file objections has passed. See 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (setting a 14-day deadline to file objections; FED. R. CIV. P.
72(b)(2) (same); see also Dkt. No. 36 at 16–17 (advising parties of the 14-day
deadline).
After independently reviewing the record and considering the applicable law,
the Court adopts the proposed R&R in its entirety. The Court hereby DENIES
Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Dkt. No. 1. A certificate of appealability shall
not issue. The Court will direct entry of Final Judgment separately.

SIGNED this 2nd day of May, 2018.
___________________________________
Hilda Tagle
Senior United States District Judge

1/1