Vasquez v. Quarterman

Filing 63

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY re: 56 Memorandum and Recommendations.(Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified.(mserpa, )

Download PDF
Vasquez v. Quarterman Doc. 63 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION ALFREDO VASQUEZ, Petitioner, VS. NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, Respondent. § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. C-04-277 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY On June 27, 2008, United States Magistrate Judge Brian L. Owsley signed a Memorandum and Recommendation recommending that petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability (D.E. 48) be denied and that petitioner be advised that he may request the issuance of a certificate of appealability from a federal circuit court of appeals judge. On July 18, 2008, petitioner filed Objections to the Magistrate's Recommendations. Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law therein, as well as the pleadings on file and petitioner's objections, and having made a de novo disposition of those portions of the Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition to which objections were raised, see Koetting v. Thompson, 995 F.2d 37 (5th Cir. 1993), 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed.R.Civ.P.72(b), the Court hereby adopts as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability (D.E. 48) is denied. Petitioner is advised that he may request the issuance of a certificate of appealability from a federal circuit court of appeals judge. 1/2 Dockets.Justia.com The clerk shall enter this order and provide a copy to all parties. SIGNED and ORDERED this 21st day of July, 2008. ___________________________________ Janis Graham Jack United States District Judge 2/2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?