Henderson v. Quarterman

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 4 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Objections to M&R due by 2/21/2008.( Signed by Judge Brian L Owsley ) Parties notified.(kwallace, ) (Copy of M&R sent to petitioner with white card)

Download PDF
Henderson v. Quarterman Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION ROGER WALLACE HENDERSON v. NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN § § § § § C.A. NO. C-08-042 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PETITIONER'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Petitioner is a state inmate currently incarcerated at the McConnell Unit in Beeville, Texas who has filed a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging a disciplinary proceeding. (D.E. 1). On February 4, 2008, he filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (D.E. 4). Petitioner's inmate trust fund account statement indicates that he currently has a balance of $79.05 in his account. (D.E. 4, at 3). According to this statement, $264.00 has been deposited into his inmate trust fund account during the last six months. Id. Moreover, there are no holds on his account. Id. The filing fee for a habeas corpus petition is $5.00. It is respectfully recommended that petitioner be found not indigent and that his application to proceed in forma pauperis, (D.E. 4), be denied. It is further respectfully recommended that petitioner be instructed to pay the filing fee within twenty (20) days of the date of entry of any order adopting this memorandum and Dockets.Justia.com recommendation, or voluntarily dismiss the petition. Finally, it is respectfully recommended that petitioner be advised that failure to pay the fee within the time period proscribed may result in dismissal of his petition for failure to prosecute. ORDERED this 6th day of February 2008. ____________________________________ BRIAN L. OWSLEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 NOTICE TO PARTIES The Clerk will file this Memorandum and Recommendation and transmit a copy to each party or counsel. Within TEN (10) DAYS after being served with a copy of the Memorandum and Recommendation, a party may file with the Clerk and serve on the United States Magistrate Judge and all parties, written objections, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Rule 8(b)(3) of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and Article IV, General Order No. 02-13, United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. A party's failure to file written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendations in a magistrate judge's report and recommendation within TEN (10) DAYS after being served with a copy shall bar that party, except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc). 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?