Essex Insurance Company v. Hines et al

Filing 20

ORDER re: Deft Hines clarification regarding request for coverage from Pltff in the underlying Texas state court lawsuit. (Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified.(lcayce, )

Download PDF
Essex Insurance Company v. Hines et al Doc. 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, VS. JACKIE HINES, et al, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. C-08-125 ORDER On July 24, 2008, the Court held an initial pretrial and scheduling conference in the above-styled action. At that conference, Defendant Jackie Hines issued a clarification regarding her request for coverage from Plaintiff Essex Insurance Company ("Essex"), with regard to the underlying Texas state court lawsuit Robert Childers and Kathryn Childers v. Jackie Hines, Cause No. 07-60038-2, County Court at Law No. 2, Nueces County, Texas. Specifically, Ms. Hines indicated that she is solely requesting coverage with regard to Mr. and Ms. Childers' claim for negligence in the underlying lawsuit. Ms. Hines is not requesting coverage for the Childers' remaining claims against Ms. Hines in the underlying lawsuit.1 Whether or not Essex has a duty to defend Ms. Hines on the Childers' claim for negligence will determine whether Essex has a duty to defend Ms. Hines in the underlying lawsuit as a whole, because "[a]n insurer is obligated to defend an insured as long as the complaint alleges at least one cause of action within the 1 In the underlying lawsuit, Mr. and Ms. Childers bring the following claims against Ms. Hines: (1) breach of contract; (2) common law fraud; (3) statutory fraud; (4) fraud in a real estate transaction; (5) negligence; (6) gross negligence (for exemplary damages); and (7) various violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act ("DTPA"). 1/2 Dockets.Justia.com policy's coverage." Canutillo Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., 99 F.3d 695, 701 (5th Cir. 1996) (emphasis added). SIGNED and ORDERED this 25th day of July, 2008. ___________________________________ Janis Graham Jack United States District Judge 2/2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?