Harris v. Gutierrez

Filing 25

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT RESPONDENTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re: 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment with Brief in Support, 20 Memorandum and Recommendations,. Petitioners habeas petition is dismissed. Certificate of appealability is denied.(Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified.(bcortez, )

Download PDF
Harris v. Gutierrez Doc. 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION DARIN DERAIL HARRIS, SR, Petitioner, VS. ERNEST H GUTIERREZ, et al, Respondents. § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. C-10-39 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT On July 16, 2010, United States Magistrate Judge Brian L. Owsley signed a Memorandum and Recommendation recommending that respondent's motion for summary judgment (D.E. 12) be granted, that petitioner's habeas petition (D.E. 1) be dismissed, and that petitioner be denied a certificate of appealability. On August 9, 2010, petitioner filed Objections to the Magistrate's Recommendations. Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law therein, as well as the pleadings on file and petitioner's objections, and having made a de novo disposition of those portions of the Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition to which objections were raised, see Koetting v. Thompson, 995 F.2d 37 (5th Cir. 1993), 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed.R.Civ.P.72(b), the Court hereby adopts as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that respondent's motion for summary judgment is granted and petitioner's habeas petition is dismissed. Certificate of appealability is denied. 1/2 Dockets.Justia.com The clerk shall enter this order and provide a copy to all parties. SIGNED and ORDERED this 1st day of December, 2010. ___________________________________ Janis Graham Jack United States District Judge 2/2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?