Riches v. Howe et al

Filing 5

OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL.(Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified.(bcortez, )

Download PDF
Riches v. Howe et al Doc. 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION JONATHAN LEE RICHES; aka SHAHZAD, § § Petitioner, § VS. § § HOWE, et al, § § Respondents. § CIVIL ACTION NO. C-10-226 OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL Petitioner is incarcerated at the Federal Medical Center (FMC) in Lexington, Kentucky. In this petition for relief filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, he states that he is challenging the unconstitutional execution of his sentence (D.E. 1 at 1).1 Petitioner alleges that after he made a report to security officers about misconduct by FMC Lexington employees, he was terminated from the residential drug treatment program (D.E. 1). Petitioner continues to experience retaliation at the hand of FMC Lexington employees (Id.). A petition pursuant to § 2241 must be filed in the district of incarceration, where the District Court has jurisdiction over the prisoner and his custodian. Lee v. Wetzel, 244 F.3d 370, 373 (5th Cir. 2001). Petitioner and his custodian are located in the Eastern District of Kentucky. Moreover, to the extent petitioner's raises constitutional tort claims against the respondents in their individual capacities, such claims must also be brought in the Eastern District of Texas, where the events occurred which form the basis for his claims and where the defendants are located. 28 U.S.C. § 1391. Petitioner was convicted in the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, of financial crimes, in Cause No. 4:03cr90(02). He was sentenced in 2004 to serve 125 months in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons. 1 1/2 Dockets.Justia.com All claims are dismissed without prejudice to petitioner's right to file them in the proper court. SIGNED and ORDERED this 12th day of July, 2010. ___________________________________ Janis Graham Jack United States District Judge 2/2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?