Waddleton v. Jackson et al

Filing 138

ORDER denying 136 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified. Copy of this Order mailed to Inmate Trust Fund and TDCJ - Office of the Attorney General. (lcayce, 2)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION MARVIN WADDLETON III, Plaintiff, VS. NORRIS JACKSON, et al, Defendants. January 19, 2016 David J. Bradley, Clerk § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10-CV-267 § § § § ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL Pending is Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal. (D.E. 136). By Order and Final Judgment entered October 24, 2012, this Court dismissed with prejudice Plaintiff’s § 1983 claims challenging strip and visual cavity searches conducted by defendant prison officials. (D.E. 104, 105). On January 22, 2014, by judgment issued as mandate, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claims. (D.E. 123, 124). On June 9, 2014, the United States Supreme Court denied Plaintiff’s petition for a writ of certiorari. (D.E. 126). Despite Final Judgment being entered over three years ago and Plaintiff having exhausted his appeals, Plaintiff persists in filing frivolous post-trial motions.1 The Court has considered Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal (D.E. 136) and finds that it is without merit and should be denied. Therefore, Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal (D.E. 136) is DENIED 1 Motion to File Criminal Complaint (D.E. 127); Motion for Leave of Court (for discovery and a jury trial) (D.E. 129); Motion to Object to Magistrate Denial (D.E. 131). 1/3 as this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3) that the appeal is not filed in good faith. Although this Court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith, Plaintiff may challenge this finding by filing a separate motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the Clerk of Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, within thirty (30) days of this Order. FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(5). The cost to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal with the Fifth Circuit is calculated below, and if Plaintiff moves to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, the prison authorities will be directed to collect the fees as calculated in this Order. Plaintiff shall pay $505.00 for the appellate filing fee in monthly installments to the United States District Court as provided in 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(b)(1). The Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional Institutions Division shall deduct 20% of each deposit made to Plaintiff=s inmate trust account and forward payments to the United States District Court on a regular basis provided that the account exceeds $10.00. Plaintiff shall sign all consents and other documents required by the agency having custody of Plaintiff to authorize the necessary withdrawal from Plaintiff=s inmate trust account. If Plaintiff moves to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, the clerk shall mail a copy of this Order to the Inmate Trust Fund, P.O. Box 629, Huntsville, Texas 773420629 and to TDCJ - Office of the General Counsel, P.O. Box 13084, Capitol Station, Austin, Texas 78711. 2/3 ORDERED this 19th day of January, 2016. ___________________________________ NELVA GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3/3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?