UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 2008 FORD EXPEDITION SUV (VIN: 1FMFU19588LA79197)

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION re: 10 Memorandum and Recommendations, denying 7 MOTION for Judgment (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
VS.
2008 FORD EXPEDITION SUV (VIN:
1FMFU19588LA79197)

§
§
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-CV-00133
§
§
§

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
TO DENY CLAIMANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT
On October 26, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Brian L. Owsley issued his
“Memorandum and Recommendation to Deny Claimant’s Motion for Judgment” (D.E.
10).

The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the

Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation.

FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear
error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005)
(citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 10), and all other relevant
documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Claimant’s Motion

1/2

for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to FRCP 12(c) or, Alternatively, Motion for
Summary Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 56 (D.E. 7) is DENIED.
ORDERED this 10th day of December, 2012.

___________________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2