Carey v. Commissioner of Social Security Office
Filing
8
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION re: 7 Memorandum and Recommendations (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
ROCHELLE LUCILLE CAREY,
Plaintiff,
VS.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY OFFICE,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-CV-00040
ORDER ADOPTING
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Complaint (D.E. 1), appealing the social
security disability decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, along with the
parties’ Briefs (D.E. 5, 6). On October 7, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge B. Janice
Ellington issued a Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 7), recommending that the
Commissioner’s decision that Plaintiff is not disabled be affirmed. The parties were
provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s
Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);
General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear
error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005)
(citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
1/2
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 7), and all other relevant
documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Commissioner’s
determination that Plaintiff is not disabled is AFFIRMED.
ORDERED this 4th day of November, 2013.
___________________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2/2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?