Spencer v. The United States

Filing 15

ORDER granting 6 Motion to Dismiss. This action is dismissed.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION ANTHONY W. SPENCER, Plaintiff, VS. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-CV-00079 ORDER Before the Court is the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (D.E. 6). Defendant seeks dismissal of this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) because the Complaint does not allege sufficient facts to state a claim that is plausible on its face as required by Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1966 (2007) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937 (2009). Plaintiff’s Response (D.E. 9) added some argument and authorities, but the only additional “facts” offered were: (1) an affidavit that is conclusory hearsay regarding events in 2001 and before; and (2) medical information that is devoid of facts that connect any medical condition to any conduct of the Defendant. Plaintiff has failed to state facts that supply the Defendant with fair notice of the claims made against it. The Motion to Dismiss (D.E. 6) is GRANTED and this action is dismissed. ORDERED this 24th day of June, 2013. ___________________________________ NELVA GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1/1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?