UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. REAL PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED AT 121 E FULTON MATHIS, TEXAS 78368, AND 303 BEE STREET MATHIS, TEXAS 78368

Filing 26

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 25 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Order Denying 23 Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(sscotch, 2)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-CV-00385 § REAL PROPERTY AND § IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED AT 121 E § FULTON MATHIS, TEXAS 78368, AND § 303 BEE STREET MATHIS, TEXAS § 78368, et al, § § Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION On April 10, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his “Memorandum and Recommendation” (D.E. 25). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 25), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the 1/2 findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Ricardo Guerrero’s Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment (D.E. 23) is DENIED. ORDERED this 19th day of May, 2014. ___________________________________ NELVA GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2/2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?