De Santiago-Young et al v. Histopath, Inc. et al

Filing 37

ORDER granting 30 MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
DENA K. DE SANTIAGO-YOUNG, et al,
Plaintiffs,
VS.
HISTOPATH, INC., et al,
Defendant.

§
§
§
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-179
§
§
§
§

ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Plaintiff’s Third Amended
Complaint (D.E. 30), Defendant Histopath, Inc’s opposition and motion to dismiss claims
(D.E. 31), and Plaintiffs reply (D.E. 33). After due consideration, the Court GRANTS
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint.
The Clerk of the Court is ordered to file Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint, which
was filed as Exhibit 1 to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave. (D.E. 30).
Defendant Histopath's motion to dismiss was premature at the time it was filed. The
Clerk of the Court is ordered to file Defendant Histopath's motion to dismiss which was filed
within Defendant Histopath's opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for leave as of the date of this
Order. (D.E. 31). Plaintiff will have 21 days to respond as set forth in the Local Rules for the
Southern District of Texas.
ORDERED this 10th day of March, 2015.
___________________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1/1