Richardson v. Livingston et al

Filing 70

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION denying 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment Based on Plaintiff's Failure to Exhaust Remedies (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION BRANDON RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, VS. BRAD LIVINGSTON, et al, Defendants. August 23, 2016 David J. Bradley, Clerk § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-CV-00464 § § § § ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION Pending before the Court is “Defendants Bunch, Trevino, Hunt, and Salinas’ Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Plaintiff’s Failure to Exhaust Remedies” (D.E. 52). On June 7, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge B. Janice Ellington issued her “Memorandum and Recommendation on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.” (D.E. 62). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings and conclusions set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 62), summary judgment evidence, and all 1/2 other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. 52) is hereby DENIED. ORDERED this 23rd day of August, 2016. ___________________________________ NELVA GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2/2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?