Jones v. Stephens

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: granting 11 MOTION for Summary Judgment with Brief in Support, adopting 15 Memorandum and Recommendations. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. In the event that Petitioner requests a Certificate of Appealability, that request is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION BRIAN K JONES, Petitioner, VS. WILLIAM STEPHENS, Respondent. § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-CV-00077 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION On June 9, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his “Memorandum and Recommendation” (D.E. 15), recommending that this action be dismissed. The Petitioner was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 15), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Respondent’s Motion 1/2 for Summary Judgment (D.E. 11) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. In the event that Petitioner requests a Certificate of Appealability, that request is DENIED. ORDERED this 6th day of July, 2015. ___________________________________ NELVA GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2/2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?