Randle v. Stephens
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 36 . The Court DENIES Randle's MOTION for a Certificate of Appealability 30 .(Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
January 19, 2018
David J. Bradley, Clerk
CIVIL NO. 2:16-CV-21
The Court has before it Petitioner Buford Randle’s (“Randle”) motion for a
Recommendation (“M&R”) of the Magistrate Judge to whom this case was referred
(Dkt. No. 36). In the M&R, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court deny
Randle a certificate of appealability. The time to file objections has passed, and no
objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (setting a 14-day deadline to file
objections); see also M&R, Dkt. No. 36 at 3 (advising parties of the 14-day deadline).
After an independent review of the record and applicable law, the Court
ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s M&R (Dkt. No. 36) and DENIES Randle’s motion
for a certificate of appealability (Dkt. No. 30).
SIGNED this 19th day of January, 2018.
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?