Caldwell v. Furr et al

Filing 54

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 51 Memorandum and Recommendations, GRANTS IN PART 42 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Caldwell's deliberate indifference claims against Perales and De Los Santos based on qualified immunity grounds; and DENIES 42 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to Caldwell's excessive force claims against Martinez and Garza.(Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION REAGAN JAMES CALDWELL, Plaintiff, VS. COREY FURR, et al, Defendants. § § § § § § § § March 26, 2019 David J. Bradley, Clerk CIVIL NO. 2:16-CV-456 ORDER The Court is in receipt of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 42, filed on behalf of Defendants Derek Garza (“Garza”), Fernando Martinez (“Martinez”), Jessica De Los Santos (“De Los Santos”), and Cheryl Perales (“Perales”); Reagan James Caldwell’s (“Caldwell”) Summary Judgment Objections, Dkt. No. 43; Caldwell’s Submit Exhibit(s) for Objections to Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 50; and the November 18, 2018 Memorandum and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge to whom this case was referred, Dkt. No. 51. After independently reviewing the record and considering the applicable law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R, Dkt. No. 51; GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 42, in part, and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Caldwell’s deliberate indifference claims against Perales and De Los Santos based on qualified immunity grounds; and DENIES Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 42, with respect to Caldwell’s excessive force claims against Martinez and Garza. SIGNED this 25th day of March 2019. ___________________________________ Hilda Tagle Senior United States District Judge 1/1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?