Buck v. Aransas County, Texas
ORDER granting 3 Motion for More Definite Statement. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file his amended complaint on or before January 30, 2017.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
RUSSELL FRANKLIN BUCK,
ARANSAS COUNTY, TEXAS,
January 24, 2017
David J. Bradley, Clerk
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-472
ORDER ON MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
Plaintiff, Russell Franklin Buck, filed this employment discrimination case against
Defendant, Aransas County, Texas, alleging age and sex (gender) discrimination. Before
the Court is Defendant’s Motion for a More Definite Statement (D.E. 3), complaining
that Plaintiff’s assertion that his claims are brought pursuant to “State and Federal Law”
is insufficient to provide notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 of the specific
law supporting Plaintiffs’ causes of action. Plaintiff has responded that Rule 8 does not
require him to provide notice of the legal theories on which his claims are based. D.E. 5.
Defendant filed a reply in support of its motion. D.E. 6.
Plaintiff asserts that this case is brought under federal question jurisdiction, 28
U.S.C. § 1331. Without stating the federal law under which the case is brought, this
Court cannot evaluate its own jurisdiction. It is the Plaintiff’s burden to sustain federal
jurisdiction in this case. Ramming v. United States, 281 F.3d 158, 161 (5th Cir. 2001).
And it is the Court’s duty to raise the issue sua sponte if the parties do not do so. Kidd v.
Southwest Airlines, Co., 891 F.2d 540, 546 (5th Cir. 1990).
For these reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion (D.E. 3) and ORDERS Plaintiff
to file an amended complaint stating the source or legal theory upon which each of his
claims is based. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file his amended complaint on or before
January 30, 2017.
ORDERED this 24th day of January, 2017.
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?