Brodie v. Colvin
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 12 Report and Recommendations (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(lrivera, 2)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
PATRICIA A. BRODIE,
CAROLYN W COLVIN,
November 28, 2017
David J. Bradley, Clerk
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-00479
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
On November 8, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his
“Memorandum and Recommendation” (D.E. 12), recommending that this Court deny
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (D.E. 7 (denominated as Plaintiff’s “Brief”))
and affirm the Commissioner’s determination. The parties were provided proper notice
of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and
Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No.
2002-13. No objections have been filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear
error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005)
(citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 12), and all other relevant
documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Brief,
construed as a motion for summary judgment (D.E. 7) is DENIED and the Court
AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration that
Plaintiff was not disabled and DISMISSES this action.
ORDERED this 27th day of November, 2017.
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?