Swyck v. Davis et al

Filing 52

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 8 47 . The Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 42 , DENIES Plaintiff's Dispositive Motion 46 , and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the above-captioned case. (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1)

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas

ENTERED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
GARY SWYCK,

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Plaintiff,
VS.
LORIE DAVIS, et al,
Defendants.

January 31, 2018
David J. Bradley, Clerk

CIVIL NO. 2:16-CV-489

ORDER
The Court has before it the Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) of
the Magistrate Judge to whom this case was referred (Dkt. No. 8), recommending
that the Court dismiss certain claim and retain the above-captioned case,
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 42), Plaintiff’s Dispositive
Motion (Dkt. No. 46), the Magistrate Judge’s M&R recommending that the Court
grant Defendant’s motion (Dkt. No. 47), and Plaintiff’s objections to that M&R (Dkt.
No. 51).
After independently reviewing the record and applicable law, the Court
ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s M&Rs (Dkt. Nos. 8, 47). Accordingly, the Court
GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 42), DENIES
Plaintiff’s Dispositive Motion (Dkt. No. 46), and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE
the above-captioned case. Final Judgment will be entered separately in accordance
with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.
SIGNED this 31st day of January, 2018.
___________________________________
Hilda Tagle
Senior United States District Judge

1/1