Madrigal v. Russell Trust Association et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION re: 6 Report and Recommendations (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(fcarbia, 2)

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas

ENTERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

December 18, 2017
David J. Bradley, Clerk

REYNALDO MADRIGAL,

§
§
Plaintiff,
§
VS.
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-CV-00340
§
RUSSELL TRUST ASSOCIATION, et al, §
§
Defendants.
§
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
On November 21, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his
“Memorandum and Recommendation” (D.E. 6), recommending that this action be
dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and
opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation.
FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections
have been filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear
error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005)
(citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 6), and all other relevant
1/2

documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, this action is

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
ORDERED this 18th day of December, 2017.
___________________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2