Gross v. Dannatt

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION re: 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, 7 MOTION to Withdraw 1 Complaint, 5 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas

ENTERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
ROBERT H GROSS,
Plaintiff,
VS.
JEANINE E DANNATT,
Defendant.

March 19, 2018
David J. Bradley, Clerk

§
§
§
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-CV-12
§
§
§
§

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
On January 10, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued a
Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Case (M&R), recommending dismissal
of this case. D.E. 4. The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to
object to, the M&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No.
2002–13. No objections have been filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation is filed, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on
the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005)
(citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the M&R,
and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court
ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and
DISMISSES this action with prejudice. The Court further DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff
1/2

Robert H. Gross’s motions for a temporary injunction (D.E. 6) and to withdraw his
complaint and amended complaint (D.E. 7).
ORDERED this 19th day of March, 2018.
___________________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2