Williams v. In The United States District of The American et al

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 21 Memorandum and Recommendations; and DISMISSES this case for failure to prosecute.(Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1)

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas

ENTERED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
DONALD RAY WILLIAMS SR,
Plaintiff,
VS.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
OF THE AMERICAN, et al,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

April 27, 2018
David J. Bradley, Clerk

CIVIL NO. 2:18-CV-47

ORDER
The

Court

has

received

the

Magistrate

Judge’s

March

30,

2018,

Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”), Dkt. No 20, and Amended M&R, Dkt.
No. 21.1 The time to file objections has passed, and no objections have been filed.
See Dkt. No. 21 at 3 (advising parties of the 14-day deadline to file objections).
After independently reviewing the record and applicable law, the Court
ADOPTS the Amended M&R, Dkt. No. 21, and DISMISSES the above-captioned
case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See also Martinez v.
Johnson, 104 F.3d 769, 772 (5th Cir. 1997) (holding that district courts have the
power to sua sponte dismiss a cause of action for failure to prosecute).
SIGNED this 27th day of April, 2018.
___________________________________
Hilda Tagle
Senior United States District Judge

The M&R was amended to include notice to Plaintiff of his right to file objections within 14 days.
No substantive amendments were made.
1

1/1