Casterline v. Gutierrez et al

Filing 28

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 23 Memorandum and Recommendations and DENIES 21 Plaintiff's MOTION to Alter or Amend Judgment. (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1)

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas

ENTERED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
DEAMUS TROY CASTERLINE,
Plaintiff,
VS.
DAVID GUTIERREZ, et al,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

September 04, 2018
David J. Bradley, Clerk

CIVIL NO. 2:18-CV-59

ORDER
The Court has received Plaintiff’s objections to the magistrate judge’s order
denying leave to amend, Dkt. No. 22, Plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend judgment,
Dkt. No. 21, Plaintiff’s supplemental authorities to his motion, Dkt. No. 24, the
magistrate judge’s June 23, 2018, memorandum and recommendation (“M&R”),
Dkt. No. 23, and Plaintiff’s objections to the M&R, Dkt. No. 27.
After independently reviewing the filings, the record, and applicable law, the
Court concludes that Plaintiff has shown neither a manifest error of law or fact in
the Court’s conclusion that his claims lack merit nor clear error in the magistrate
judge’s denial of leave to amend. Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiff’s
objections, Dkt. Nos. 22, 27, ADOPTS the June 23, 2018, M&R, Dkt. No. 23, and
DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to alter or amend judgment, Dkt. No. 21.
SIGNED this 4th day of September, 2018.
___________________________________
Hilda Tagle
Senior United States District Judge

1/1