West v. Putman et al
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 9 Memorandum and Recommendations; and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim and/or as frivolous. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purpos es of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court therefore DIRECTS the Clerk to send notice of this dismissal to the Manager of the Three Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas at Three_Strikes@txs.uscourts.gov (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
MICHAEL RAY WEST,
Plaintiff,
VS.
KENNETH H. PUTMAN JR., et al,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
September 04, 2018
David J. Bradley, Clerk
CIVIL NO. 2:18-CV-71
ORDER
The Court has received the Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) of
the magistrate judge, Dkt. No. 9. The time to file objections to the M&R has passed,
and no objections have been filed.1
After reviewing the filings and applicable law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R,
Dkt. No. 9, and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s complaint for failure
to state a claim and/or as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and
1915A(b)(1). This dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court therefore DIRECTS the Clerk to send notice of this dismissal to the
Manager of the Three Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas at
Three_Strikes@txs.uscourts.gov.
Final Judgment will be entered separately.
SIGNED this 4th day of September, 2018.
___________________________________
Hilda Tagle
Senior United States District Judge
Plaintiff filed a letter asking the Court to assist Plaintiff in identifying various prison officials. Dkt.
No. 11. This letter does not respond to the M&R or address the merits of Plaintiff’s claim, and the
Court takes no action in response to the letter.
1
1/1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?