Evans v. Muro et al
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 18 Memorandum and Recommendations, and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the above-captioned case for failure to state a claim and/or as frivolous. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court therefore INSTRUCTS the Clerk to send notice of this dismissal to the Manager of the Three Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas. (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
BOBBY DEWAYNE EVANS,
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Plaintiff,
VS.
JAVIER MURO, et al,
Defendants.
September 04, 2018
David J. Bradley, Clerk
CIVIL NO. 2:18-CV-127
ORDER
The
Court
has
received
the
magistrate
judge’s
Memorandum
and
Recommendation (“M&R”), Dkt. No. 18, in which the magistrate judge recommends
that this case be dismissed for failure to state a claim and/or as frivolous. The
deadline to file objections to the M&R has passed, and no objections have been filed.
See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (setting 14-day deadline to object); M&R, Dkt. No. 18 at 15
(advising Plaintiff of the 14-day deadline).
After independently reviewing the record and applicable law, the Court
ADOPTS the M&R, Dkt. No. 18, and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the abovecaptioned case for failure to state a claim and/or as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. §§
1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). This dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28
U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court therefore INSTRUCTS the Clerk to send notice of this
dismissal to the Manager of the Three Strikes List for the Southern District of
Texas at Three_Strikes@txs.uscourts.gov.
SIGNED this 4th day of September, 2018.
___________________________________
Hilda Tagle
Senior United States District Judge
1/1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?