Cardenas-Lira v. Banker et al
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 25 Memorandum and Recommendations. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, Dkt. No. 23 . The Court SANCTIONS Cardenas-Lira $250.00 because he continues to make frivolous filings despite previous warnings. (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scastillo, 1)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
JOSE FERNANDO CARDENAS-LIRA,
Plaintiff,
VS.
CHARLES A. BANKER III, et al,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
August 29, 2019
David J. Bradley, Clerk
CIVIL NO. 2:18-CV-144
ORDER
The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff Jose Fernando Cardenas-Lira’s
(“Cardenas-Lira”) application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, Dkt. No. 23;
the Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”), Dkt. No. 25;
and Plaintiff’s objections to the M&R, Dkt. No. 26.
After independently reviewing the record and applicable law, the Court
ADOPTS the M&R, Dkt. No. 25.
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s
motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, Dkt. No. 23.
The Court
SANCTIONS Cardenas-Lira $250.00 because he continues to make frivolous filings
despite previous warnings. Officials in charge of the Inmate Trust Fund for Reeves
III Correctional Institution in Pecos, Texas shall deduct this amount from the trust
account belonging to Jose Fernando Cardenas-Lira (BOP # 82905-379) and forward
it to the Clerk of the Court when funds are available.
The Clerk will provide a copy of this Order to (1) the plaintiff and (2) to the
Trust Fund Supervisor, Reeves III Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 2038, Pecos,
Texas 79772.
SIGNED this 29th day of August 2019.
___________________________________
Hilda Tagle
Senior United States District Judge
1/1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?