Nelson v. Davis et al
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 13 Memorandum and Recommendations and denying 11 Motion to Reinstate construed as a Rule 59(e) motion. (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(vrios, 2)
Case 2:19-cv-00371 Document 14 Filed on 01/10/22 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
LORI DAVIS, et al.,
January 10, 2022
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-00371
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REINSTATE
On December 3, 2021, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued a
“Memorandum and Recommendation to Deny Plaintiff's Motion to Reinstate” (M&R, D.E.
13). Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate
Judge’s M&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13.
No objections have been timely filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s M&R is filed, the district court
need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the
magistrate judge’s M&R. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir.
2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s M&R (D.E. 13), and all other relevant documents in the record, and
finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the
Case 2:19-cv-00371 Document 14 Filed on 01/10/22 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Motion to Reinstate (D.E. 11) is construed as a Rule
59(e) motion and is DENIED.
ORDERED on January 10, 2022.
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?