Rivera v. Texas Board of Pardon & Paroles
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 10 Memorandum and Recommendations; the Court dismisses Plaintiff's petition for writ of habeas corpus(Signed by Judge David S Morales) Parties notified.(arodriguez, 2)
Case 2:20-cv-00136 Document 13 Filed on 01/07/21 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
JOSE ANGEL RIVERA,
TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS &
January 07, 2021
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-CV-136
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie Hampton’s Memorandum and
Recommendation (M&R). (D.E. 10). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the
opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s M&R. See U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R.
CIV. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. Petitioner filed objections to the M&R.1 (D.E.
12). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the M&R, the
record, the applicable law, and having made a de novo review of the portions of the M&R
to which the Plaintiff’s objections were directed, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court
OVERRULES Plaintiff’s objections (D.E. 12). Accordingly, the Court:
(1) ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 10).
(2) DISMISSES Plaintiff’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 2241, pursuant to the screening provisions in Rule 4 of the Rules
Governing Section 2254 Cases.
It appears that Petitioner did not timely file his objections. See (D.E. 10, p. 6; D.E. 11; D.E. 12,
p. 6). Nevertheless, the Court will consider the objections. (D.E. 12).
Case 2:20-cv-00136 Document 13 Filed on 01/07/21 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
DAVID S. MORALES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: Corpus Christi, Texas
January 7, 2021
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?