Degelo v. United States Department of the Interior et al
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE re: 6 Memorandum and Recommendations. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(legarza, 2)
Case 2:21-cv-00114 Document 7 Filed on 09/08/21 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
KRISTINA D. DEGELO,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
THE INTERIOR, et al,
September 08, 2021
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:21-CV-114
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
TO DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
On August 3, 2021, United States Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton issued her
“Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Case for Failure to Prosecute” (M&R,
Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the
Magistrate Judge’s M&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order
No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s M&R is filed, the district court
need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the
magistrate judge’s M&R. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir.
2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir.
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s M&R (D.E. 6), and all other relevant documents in the record, and
finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the
Case 2:21-cv-00114 Document 7 Filed on 09/08/21 in TXSD Page 2 of 2
Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
for failure to prosecute.
ORDERED this 8th day of September, 2021.
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?