Silvas, Jr. v. Doctor Villereal et al

Filing 59

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 55 Memorandum and Recommendations, DENYING 54 MOTION to Reopen Case, and DENYING 53 MOTION to Reopen Case (Signed by Judge David S Morales) Parties notified.(arodriguez, 2)

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas

ENTERED
November 18, 2022

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
JULIAN GALVAN SILVAS, JR.,
Plaintiff,
V.
DOCTOR VILLEREAL, et al. ,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

Nathan Ochsner, Clerk

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-cv-00070

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie Hampton' s Memorandum and
Recommendation (M&R). (D.E. 55). The M&R recommends that Plaintiffs motions to
reopen the case, construed as motions for reconsideration, (D .E . 53; D.E. 54), be denied.
(D.E. 55).
The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the
Magistrate Judge's M&R. See 28 U .S.C. § 636(b)(l); FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b); General Order
No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the
district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge ' s M&R is clearly
erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson , 864 F .2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989)
(per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700, 2015 WL
3823141 , at *l (S .D . Tex. June 18, 2015).
Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate
Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the
M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its
1/ 2

entirety. (D .E. 55). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs motions to reopen the case.
(D.E. 53; D.E. 54).
SO ORDERED.

DA
S. MORALES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: Corpus Chrj~i,Jexas
November tr!._";"'2,022

2/2