Silvas, Jr. v. Doctor Villereal et al

Filing 59

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 55 Memorandum and Recommendations, DENYING 54 MOTION to Reopen Case, and DENYING 53 MOTION to Reopen Case (Signed by Judge David S Morales) Parties notified.(arodriguez, 2)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED November 18, 2022 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION JULIAN GALVAN SILVAS, JR., Plaintiff, V. DOCTOR VILLEREAL, et al. , Defendants. § § § § § § § § Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-cv-00070 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Julie Hampton' s Memorandum and Recommendation (M&R). (D.E. 55). The M&R recommends that Plaintiffs motions to reopen the case, construed as motions for reconsideration, (D .E . 53; D.E. 54), be denied. (D.E. 55). The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's M&R. See 28 U .S.C. § 636(b)(l); FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge ' s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson , 864 F .2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700, 2015 WL 3823141 , at *l (S .D . Tex. June 18, 2015). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its 1/ 2 entirety. (D .E. 55). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs motions to reopen the case. (D.E. 53; D.E. 54). SO ORDERED. DA S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: Corpus Chrj~i,Jexas November tr!._";"'2,022 2/2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?