Aumada v. Officer Garcia et al

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONTO DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE re: 19 Memorandum and Recommendations (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(legarza, 2)

Case 2:22-cv-00208 Document 22 Filed on 01/18/23 in TXSD Page 1 of 2
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas

ENTERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

RUBEN AUMADA,
Plaintiff,
VS.
OFFICER GARCIA, et al.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

January 18, 2023
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00208

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
TO DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE
On November 22, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton issued a
“Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Case Without Prejudice” (M&R, D.E.
19). Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate
Judge’s M&R. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13.
No objections have been timely filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s M&R is filed, the district court
need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the
magistrate judge’s M&R. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005)
(citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s M&R (D.E. 19), and all other relevant documents in the record, and
finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the
1/2

Case 2:22-cv-00208 Document 22 Filed on 01/18/23 in TXSD Page 2 of 2

Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b).
ORDERED on January 18, 2023.
_______________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2