Stanford et al v. Gates et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: #11 Memorandum and Recommendations. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's case. (Signed by Judge David S Morales) Parties notified.(arodriguez, 2)

Download PDF
Case 2:22-cv-00275 Document 14 Filed on 01/18/23 in TXSD Page 1 of 2 United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION JOSEPH A. STANFORD, et al. , Plaintiffs, V. BILL GATES, et al. , Defendants. § § § § § § § § January 18, 2023 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:22-CV-00275 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Jason Libby ' s Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"). (D.E. 11). The M&R recommends that the Court DISMISS Plaintiff Joseph A. Stanford' s case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failing to comply with court order. Id. at 1, 2. The parties were provided proper notice of, and the opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's M&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l); FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b); General Order No. 2002-13. No objection has been filed. 1 When no timely objection has been filed, the district court need only determine whether the Magistrate Judge ' s M&R is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. United States v. Wilson , 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam); Powell v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, No. CIV. A. H-14-2700, 2015 WL 3823141 , at *1 (S.D. Tex. June 18, 2015). Having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, the filings of the parties, the record, and the applicable law, and finding that the M&R is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 11). The Court 1 The same day the M&R was filed, Plaintiff Joseph Stanford filed a letter regarding his case. See (D.E. 12). However, the letter was largely illegible and the portions that were legible did not reference the M&R. As such, this letter cannot be construed as an objection to the M&R. 1/2 Case 2:22-cv-00275 Document 14 Filed on 01/18/23 in TXSD Page 2 of 2 DISMISSES Plaintiffs' case pursuant to Rule 41 (b) for fai lure to comply with court order. A final judgment shall be entered separately. SO ORDERED. D S. MORALES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas January 18, 2023 2/2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?