Perez v. Hanson

Filing 9

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION To Dismiss For Failure To Prosecute re: 8 Memorandum and Recommendations, (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(JaredMarks, 2)

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas

ENTERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
MARIO A PEREZ,
Petitioner,
VS.
RALPH HANSON,
Respondent.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

February 05, 2024
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00243

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
On January 3, 2024, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his
“Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute” (D.E. 8).
Petitioner was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate
Judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);
General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error
on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing
Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 8), and all other relevant
documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the
1/2

findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Petitioner’s case is
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
41(b).
ORDERED on February 5, 2024.
_______________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2