Flores v. Madrigal et al
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONTO DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE re: 15 Memorandum and Recommendations. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified. (lg2)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
JOSE FELIPE FLORES,
Plaintiff,
VS.
MELISSA MADRIGAL, et al.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
May 09, 2024
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00020
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
TO DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
On April 11, 2024, United States Magistrate Judge Julie K. Hampton issued her
“Memorandum and Recommendation to Dismiss Case for Failure to Prosecute” (D.E. 15).
Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s
memorandum and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General
Order No. 2002-13. Plaintiff’s mail was returned as undeliverable, consistent with prior
notifications. No objections have been timely filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error
on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing
Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 15), and all other relevant
1/2
documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.
ORDERED on May 9, 2024.
_______________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2/2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?