Verlander v. Aransas County Sheriffs Dept et al

Filing 26

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 24 Memorandum and Recommendations; Case is Dismissed Without Prejudice. (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified. (var2)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION § § Plaintiff, § § VS. § § ARANSAS COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT, § et al., § § Defendants. § July 03, 2024 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk ADAM WAYNE VERLANDER, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00065 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION On May 28, 2024, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his “Memorandum and Recommendation” (D.E. 24), recommending that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute because Plaintiff failed to keep the Court apprised of his address. Plaintiff was provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 24), and all other relevant 1/2 documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). ORDERED on July 3, 2024. _______________________________ NELVA GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2/2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?