Guy v. City of Corpus Christi et al

Filing 15

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 12 Memorandum and Recommendations the Court ADOPTS as its own thefindings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified. (ntg2)

United States District Court
Southern District of Texas

ENTERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
WALTER KEVIN GUY,
Plaintiff,
VS.
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI, et al.,
Defendants.

§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§

September 24, 2024
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:24-CV-00100

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
On August 15, 2024, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his
“Memorandum and Recommendation” (D.E. 12). Plaintiff was provided proper notice of,
and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections
have been timely filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error
on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and
recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing
Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the
Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 12), and all other relevant
documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the
1/2

findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon
which relief can be granted.
ORDERED on September 24, 2024.
_______________________________
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2