Pilot v. 21st Mortgage Corporation

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 2 Memorandum and Recommendations. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 1 . (Signed by Judge David S Morales) Parties notified. (aar2)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION ROSEMON CAL VIN RICK PILOT, Plaintiff, V. 21st MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Defendant. § § § § § § § § March 05, 2025 Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-MC-00017 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock's Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"). (D.E. 2). The M&R recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's application to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Id. at 1. No objections to the M&R have been filed. When a party objects to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge, the district judge "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). As to any portion for which no objection is filed, a district court reviews for clearly erroneous factual findings and conclusions oflaw. United States v. Wilson , 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per curiam). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the M&R, the record, and the applicable law, the Court ADOPTS the findings and conclusions of the M&R, (D.E. 2). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. (D.E. 1). SO ORDERED. . MORALES STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas March 5-ff-;2025 II I

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?