Pilot v. 21st Mortgage Corporation
Filing
6
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 2 Memorandum and Recommendations. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 1 . (Signed by Judge David S Morales) Parties notified. (aar2)
United States District Court
Southern District of Texas
ENTERED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
ROSEMON CAL VIN RICK PILOT,
Plaintiff,
V.
21st MORTGAGE CORPORATION,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
March 05, 2025
Nathan Ochsner, Clerk
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:25-MC-00017
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mitchel Neurock's Memorandum and
Recommendation ("M&R"). (D.E. 2). The M&R recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's
application to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Id. at 1. No objections to the M&R have been filed.
When a party objects to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge, the
district judge "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified
proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(C). As
to any portion for which no objection is filed, a district court reviews for clearly erroneous factual
findings and conclusions oflaw. United States v. Wilson , 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989) (per
curiam). Having reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the M&R, the record, and the
applicable law, the Court ADOPTS the findings and conclusions of the M&R, (D.E. 2).
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. (D.E. 1).
SO ORDERED.
. MORALES
STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Signed: Corpus Christi, Texas
March 5-ff-;2025
II I
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?