Argo v. Brazoria County, Texas et al

Filing 19

ORDER entered ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 17 MOTION to Dismiss for Plaintiff's Failure to State a Claim, 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim or Alternatively for More Definite Statement, 14 Amended MOTION to Dismiss. No later than June 2, 2008, the parties will submit proposed scheduling and docket control orders for the issues and parties remaining in this case. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, )

Download PDF
Argo v. Brazoria County, Texas et al Doc. 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION RANDY ARGO, Plaintiff, VS. BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS, et al, Defendants § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. G-07-488 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION This court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge signed on April 14, 2008. No objections have been filed. This court has made a de novo determination of the Magistrate Judge's recommended disposition. Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219 (5th Cir. 1989. The court finds that the Memorandum and Recommendation should be, and the same is hereby, adopted as the court's Memorandum and Order. Accordingly, it is ordered that the defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied as to the use of force and false arrest damages claims asserted against defendants Woods and Fortenberry and granted as to the remaining claims and defendants. No later than June 2, 2008, the parties will submit proposed scheduling and docket control orders for the issues and parties remaining in this case. SIGNED on May 14, 2008, at Houston, Texas. ______________________________________ Lee H. Rosenthal United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?