Florence v. Galveston Police Officer Clemente Garcia III et al

Filing 130

ORDER granting 120 Motion to Quash of Allen C Isbell and the deposition by written questions served upon him by Plaintiff, Thomas Florence, is QUASHED.(Signed by Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner) Parties notified.(sanderson, 3)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION THOMAS FLORENCE, #1729344 VS. OFFICER CLEMENTE GARCIA III and SGT. CHAPMAN § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. G-11-134 ORDER On April 21, 2014, Plaintiff, Thomas Florence, pursuant to this Court’s Order dated April 11, 2014, filed his objection to Allen C. Isbell’s “Motion to Quash and/or Request for Protective Order.” The gist of the underlying argument made by Florence in his objection is that Isbell’s answers will assist him in proving that the complaint filed against him was fatally defective, that the issuance of the arrest warrant against him was invalid and that his ultimate conviction is void. But this argument is irrelevant to his pending civil case. The validity of Florences’ conviction is not at issue; the only remaining claim is his assertion that Defendant Garcia used excessive force against him at the time of his arrest. As pointed out by the District Court, the Supreme Court decision in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), bars a civil action for damages if Plaintiff, in order to win, must prove his conviction was invalid, unless Plaintiff first has the conviction vacated. Florence’ conviction has not been set aside, therefore, he may not challenge the validity of the charging documents or his conviction in this case. Since Florence cannot litigate these issues, the discovery he seeks from Isbell is irrelevant and would be inadmissible at his trial. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the “Motion to Quash and/or Request for Protective Order” (Instrument no. 120) of Allen C. Isbell is GRANTED and the deposition by written questions served upon him by Plaintiff, Thomas Florence, is QUASHED. DONE at Galveston, Texas, this 23rd 2 day of April, 2014.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?