Romero v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID

Filing 58

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 57 MOTION (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(agould, 3)

Download PDF
United States District Court Southern District of Texas ENTERED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION NELSON ROMERO, TDCJ # 01127658, Petitioner, v. LORIE DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent. July 02, 2019 David J. Bradley, Clerk § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-0098 § § § § § § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This Court dismissed Romero’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus and entered final judgment (Dkt. 49, Dkt. 50) on April 26, 2018, and denied Romero’s previous motion for reconsideration (Dkt. 54). Romero now has filed a motion for review (Dkt. 57) seeking reconsideration of the judgment. Because the motion was filed more than twenty-eight days after judgment was entered, the Court construes the filing as a motion for relief under Rule 60(b). See Demahy v. Schwarz Pharma, Inc., 702 F.3d 177, 182 n.2 (5th Cir. 2012). Rule 60(b) is an uncommon means for relief, and “final judgments should not be lightly reopened.” Lowry Dev., L.L.C. v. Groves & Associates Ins., Inc., 690 F.3d 382, 385 (5th Cir. 2012) (internal citation, alteration, and quotation marks omitted). A Rule 60(b) motion may not be used to raise arguments that could have been raised prior to judgment or to argue new legal 1/2 theories. Dial One of the Mid-S., Inc. v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., 401 F.3d 603, 607 (5th Cir. 2005). Romero’s motion for review raises the same issues regarding sufficiency of the evidence that he raised prior to entry of judgment and presents no valid ground for relief under Rule 60(b). Therefore, his motion for review (Dkt. 57) is DENIED. The Clerk will send a copy of this order to the parties. SIGNED at Galveston, Texas, this 2nd day of July, 2019. ___________________________________ George C. Hanks Jr. United States District Judge 2/2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?