Zahorik v. Trott et al

Filing 87

FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of all Dfts and against Pltf. ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff TAKE NOTHING from the Tennessee Defendants, that all claims asserted by Plaintiff against the Tennessee Defendants are DISMISSED for lack of personal jurisdi ction and that the Tennessee Defendants RECOVER their costs from Plaintiff. It is further ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff TAKE NOTHING from the Texas Defendants, that all claims asserted by Plaintiff against the Texas Defendants are DISMISSED wi th prejudice to being reasserted until the conditions of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), are met and that the Texas Defendants RECOVER their costs from Plaintiff....***Case terminated on 4/15/14(Signed by Magistrate Judge John R Froeschner) Parties notified.(sanderson, 3)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
GALVESTON DIVISION
VINCENT ZAHORIK
V.
TRACY TROTT, ET AL.

§
§
§
§
§

CIVIL ACTION NO. G-13-248

FINAL JUDGMENT
Today the Court granted the “Motion to Dismiss” of Defendants, Colonel Tracy Trott,
Captain Victor Donoho, Captain Mark Sanford, Lieutenant Dan Moore, Lieutenant Mike
Hamilton, Sergeant Ron Meyer, Trooper Bradley Aktinson, Henderson County Circuit Court
Clerk Beverly Dunaway, Assistant District Attorney for the 26th Judicial District of Tennessee
Angela Scott, and District Attorney General for the 26th Judicial District of Tennessee James
G. Woodall (collectively, the “Tennessee Defendants”) and the “Motion to Dismiss” of

Defendants, Jeremy Kylen, Mark Pilsner, Gilbert Gomez, Henry Porretto and the City of
Galveston, Texas (collectively, the “Texas Defendants”) and dismissed the complaint of
Plaintiff, Vincent Zahorik.
It is, therefore, ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff, Vincent Zahorik, TAKE
NOTHING from the Tennessee Defendants, that all claims asserted by Plaintiff, Vincent
Zahorik, against the Tennessee Defendants are DISMISSED for lack of personal
jurisdiction and that the Tennessee Defendants RECOVER their costs from Plaintiff,
Vincent Zahorik.

It is further ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff, Vincent Zahorik, TAKE
NOTHING from the Texas Defendants, that all claims asserted by Plaintiff, Vincent
Zahorik, against the Texas Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice to being reasserted
until the conditions of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), are met and that the
Texas Defendants RECOVER their costs from Plaintiff, Vincent Zahorik.
THIS IS A FINAL AND APPEALABLE JUDGMENT.
DONE at Galveston, Texas, this

15th

2

day of April, 2014.